G11 came to the aid of Grade 3 teachers today. Teachers wanted a provocation for their PYP unit on Peace and Conflict – a performed argument which would generate conversation and debate in the students who happened upon the piece of ‘invisible theatre’. The experience, and subsequent reading on Boal’s Invisible Theatre pieces in his book ‘Games for Actors and Non Actors’, began an interesting debate – how much can we rely on improvisation in Invisible Theatre? Boal’s position is – not a lot. He writes about the importance of working to a tight structure and carefully crafted script particularly when describing the piece for the Paris Metro. Is it responsible to go into a situation without careful planning and script writing? When do we know when to move away from the script and respond to our audience ‘off script’? Is the safety of actors and audience always carefully considered? Is the stuff we see in some of TV shows seen below examples of invisible theatre? I would like to argue that they are not – mainly because of their over reliance on improvisation, this means they no longer follow the conventions set out for the style of work Boal named ‘Invisible Theatre’.